Scott Huminski v. Lee County Sheriff Mike Scott Corruption Case – Further Intel

“The AEGIS Alliance encourages the US Government and others to investigate this case. Case number 17-MM-000815 in the Lee County Clerk of Courts.”

This is an update on the previously published “Scott Huminski v. Lee County Sheriff Mike Scott – Corruption Case” related to the court documents that have been obtained by The AEGIS Alliance that are available for download, free of viruses.

There is something wrong with the justice system in Lee County Florida. Sheriff Mike Scott, a Kingpin? The AEGIS Alliance had reported about Sheriff Mike Scott being a suspected Kingpin in 2016. Many individuals who have been victims of the court docket scandal have been spoken to by the defendant, they all know nothing of Judge Gentile or why he is listed on their cases. It is believed that sheriff Mike Scott conspired with judge Krier, to influence the judge’s rulings in Scott Huminski’s case. He exposed her, then she recuse’d and the State sent her back to the county she came from, Collier County. Although, the Sheriff connection is not certain as of yet. This is the same courthouse where Scott Goodyear is being tried. A fair trial becomes tough when court personnel engage in fraud. There is a real sense of lawlessness in this county, and maybe generally in Florida.

There is more after this release below that is according to a motion to disqualify notice of claims in the Huminski case obtained by The AEGIS Alliance here in a pdf. See the pdf for images of documents within the pdf.

Scores of cases now have fraudulent dockets containing some or all of the below fraudulent docket entries errors,

1. Listing Hon. Gentile as presiding over hearings that were actually presided over by Krier
2. Listing Hon. Gentile as presiding in cases he never participated in
3. Listing Hon. Gentile as presiding over cases before he became a judge
4. No Krier recusal
5. No assignment orders
6. Fraudulent krier recusal order filed in 17-mm-815, filed in November and back dated to August, Krier or clerk lost original, a copy of a copy was filed months later with a fraudulent date.
7. Only 17-mm-815 had an assignment order when Krier was ousted back to Collier, scores of cases requiring re-assignment orders by administrative judges.
8. see partial sampling below of the scores of cases
9. Lee Court database should not allow inserting back dated documents, it invites corruption.
10. Huminski assignment order issued after hearing with new judge when Huminski pointed out the problem.  The case needs to be assigned prior to hearing with a new judge.

The following is according to a motion to disqualify notice of claims in the Huminski case obtained by The AEGIS Alliance here in a pdf. See the pdf for images of documents within the pdf.

In The Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit In and for Lee County, Florida – Civil/Criminal Division – SCOTT HUMINSKI, FOR HIMSELF ) AND FOR THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED, ) PLAINTIFF ) NO. 17-MM-815 TOWN OF GILBERT, AZ, ET AL. ) DEFENDANTS. ) AKA: STATE V. HUMINSKI

MOTION TO DISQUALIFY DEFENSE COUNSEL AND NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIMS OF LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS Re: Atty. Neymotin

NOW COMES, Scott Huminski (“Huminski”), PRO SE, and, moves as set forth in the above title to disqualify defense counsel grounded upon Huminski’s filings in this case. Huminski notes he spoke with Zachary Miller, esq. today and Mr. Miller did not know of the back-dated recusal order of Judge Krier in this case which strikes at the legitimacy of this prosecution whereby Judge Krier, • Authored and signed a recusal order in Circuit Court recusing off this Circuit Court case on August 1, 2017. See docket 8/14/2017. • The original order was lost. • At hearings on August 15 and September 22 Huminski informed the Court of this problem. • On September 22, 2017 someone at the Court filed a copy of this order and back-dated it to August 14, 2017. This is fraud. • Judge Krier lied in the hearing of 6/29/2017 • Judge Krier recited fact not on the record concerning the death threats received by Huminski evidencing forbidden ex parte contact/influence.

2

NOTICE OF CLAIM – FEDERAL LAWSUIT, Ita Neymotin, et al. Notice is given that Huminski is bringing federal civil rights claims and legal malpractice claims in U.S. District Court against Ita Neymotin, esq., Regional Conflict Counsel and Zachary Miller, esq.. This case involves the exact same courthouse banishment claims that have already been litigated in Huminski v. Corsones, 396 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2005). Ms. Neymotin failed to assert my right to attend court proceedings free of threats of arrest and prosecution in retaliation for merely asserting my First Amendment and Due Process rights in a trial free of duress, threats and coercion and the right to defend myself free of these factors. Huminski will also bring associated claims against Ms. Neymotin, et al. under the First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution REQUESTING declaratory relief, actual damages, punitive damages, nominal damages or presumed damages in the same amount yielded in Huminski v. Corsones, $750,000.00 (Seven Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars). The Courthouse banishment set forth in this case is forbidden under a clearly established constitutional right and creates a cloud of illegitimacy concerning this case which Ms. Neymotin refuses to assert. See generally Huminski v. Corsones, 396 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2005). Similarly, Ms. Neymotin refuses to assert the corruption in this case evidenced by the back-dating of Judge Krier’s recusal order set forth above and the complete corruption of Lee County dockets in cases formerly presided over by Judge Krier and the fraudulent listing of Hon. Gentile as presiding over hearing and cases he was never involved in which also includes Huminski’s cases. Ms Neymotin’s representation is a prime example of the problems enunciated in the NACDL paper, Three Minute Justice: Haste and Waste in Florida’s Misdemeanor Courts. https://www.nacdl.org/reports/threeminutejustice/ Ms. Neymotin refuses to assert the impropriety and unethical nature of the State’s plea offer which includes assurance by Huminski to not engage in civil litigation against persons not parties to this matter converting the plea negotiations into a form of release/dismissal agreement which violates ethical rules. See Notre

3

Dame law journal on the topic, An Ethical Analysis of Release Dismissal Agreements. http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1458&context=ndjlepp Judge Gentile is fraudulently listed as presiding over the arraignment in this case which is indication of extreme corruption and impropriety on the docket which Ms. Neymotion refuses to assert. As the docket reveals, there did not exist 17-mm815 until 6/30/2017 on 6/29/2017 the only matter that existed was 17-ca-421 which was a criminal/civil hybrid which Ms. Neymotin misrepresents to the Court as civil only in her recusal motion and at hearing. See below docket entries and 6/29
4

SEE PDF

minutes.

5

Date Hearing Time
12/12/2017 Circuit Civil Court – McHugh, Michael T 2:30 PM

6

08/15/2017 CANCELED-Other Circuit Civil Court – Gentile, Geoffrey Henry 1:00 PM
07/31/2017 Circuit Civil Court – Gentile, Geoffrey Henry 9:15 AM
06/29/2017 Circuit Civil Court – Gentile, Geoffrey Henry 1:30 PM
05/25/2017 Circuit Civil Court – Gentile, Geoffrey Henry 8:30 AM
04/18/2017 Circuit Civil Court – Gentile, Geoffrey Henry 9:15 AM
04/18/2017 Circuit Civil Court – Gentile, Geoffrey Henry 10:30 AM
04/17/2017 Circuit Civil Court – Gentile, Geoffrey Henry 9:00 AM

Dated at Bonita Springs, Florida this 29th day of December, 2017. -/S/- Scott Huminski _____________________________________________________________ Scott Huminski, pro se 24544 Kingfish Street Bonita Springs, FL 34134 (239) 300-6656 [email protected] Certificate of Services

Copies of this document and any attachment(s) was served via the court’s efiling system on this 29th day of December, 2017 to all parties.

-/s/- Scott Huminski __________________________________________ Scott Huminski