Nestlé udsat - er en vigtig medvirkende faktor til california 's vilde brande

Dans for regn ved at stige mod:

Greetings world! We are The AEGIS Alliance, with, Anonymous allies. As the State of California has been suffering from yet another wave of wildfires this year, corporations come to mind, one of most interest being Nestle, and their unlawful actions in California, and other states, even in other countries. This December, der har været skovbrande i Los angles San Diego Santa barbarbara, San Bernardino og Ventura counties i CalifornienNoget af det er stadig ikke indeholdt på nuværende tidspunkt. I alt de flere December blazes har brændt over 256.000 hektar og tvunget 212.000 indbyggere til at evakuere deres hjem, over 1000 strukturer, herunder mange hjem, blev ødelagt.

Spørgsmålet er, om Nestle spillede en afgørende medvirkende faktor i Californiens borede forhold? Grunden er, at 2015, Nestle havde aftappet vand i Californien om udløbet af tilladelser i 27 år. It is unknown as to just how many unfathomable amounts of water that Nestle drained from California, over those past decades. This is cause for alarm, with so much water being extracted from California, and thereby being a key contributing factor in California’s very dry ground conditions. Nestle also has a bad reputation in Oregon and is the cause of protests in the state of Washington. Nestle also extracts water in other U.S. states.

USA er imidlertid ikke alene i Nestle-aftapningsvandet på udløbet tilladelser. Nestle er også blevet fanget aftapningsvand om udløbstilladelser i Canada, in recent times. Nestle had been bottling so much water in these Canadian towns, that it was being done faster than the aquifers were able to be replenished, until Canadian authorities stepped in, and did something about it. This makes it obvious, that Nestle has used these same greedy practices in California for many years, thereby being a key factor in the very dry ground conditions. It makes billions of dollars in profit by extracting water for stort set ingentingi forhold til den massive indkomst, som den har modtaget.

Unlawful bottling of water isn’t the only type of crime to humanity by Nestle. They’re also a chocolate company, that is known to use child labor in cacao plantations. Nestle also has a history of lax labor laws, which allows them to evade close scrutiny of its labor practices. Nestle dodges accountability by having factory locations in places such as Columbia, North Korea, and China while avoiding the many more legal protections in the United States. Nestle has also been the cause of much outrage by Environmental and Human Rights activists, and many others over the years, for their bad practices. There have been protests to boycott nestle produkter, og for mere end hvad der er inkluderet i denne video. Nestle har fået meget lys, for deres grusomme forbrydelser mod menneskeheden gennem årtier.

Hvis det var op til os, Nestle ville blive opkrævet for at bidrage til mange beretninger om skovbrande, ødelæggelse af ejendom, udgifter til nødtjenester, og måske endda død af de uskyldige liv taget af disse skovbrande i årenes løb i Californien. Alt fordi Nestle udvindes ufattelige mængder vand på udløbet tilladelser i 27 år i staten Californien, der ikke bliver gjort noget ved det.

In the years since this report first aired, the story has taken several major turns. In 2021, Nestlé sold its entire U.S. and Canadian bottled-water business — including the Arrowhead brand pumped from California’s San Bernardino National Forest — to the private-equity firms One Rock Capital Partners and Metropoulos & Co. for roughly $4.3 billion. The operation was rebranded as BlueTriton Brands, but the underlying fight over Strawberry Creek did not change hands so cleanly. California regulators made clear the sale would not stall their enforcement.

In September 2023, California’s State Water Resources Control Board approved a cease-and-desist order blocking BlueTriton from diverting millions of gallons of water out of the Strawberry Creek watershed — the same creek tied to the permit that expired back in 1988. Campaigners summed up the case bluntly: one cannot sell what it does not own, and the board found that neither BlueTriton nor its predecessors had ever perfected a valid pre-1914 water right to the creek. Strawberry Creek feeds the Santa Ana River, a source of drinking water for roughly 750,000 residents, and conservationists argued the decades of pumping had helped desiccate a fragile ecosystem already strained by climate change. The company disputed the findings and pursued appeals, while activists pointed to data showing it had drawn far more water than permitted.

The corporate shell game continued in November 2024, when BlueTriton merged with Primo Water to form Primo Brands Corporation, now trading publicly on the New York Stock Exchange. The names on the bottles keep changing, but the core grievance that drove this report — a multinational profiting off public water in a drought-prone, fire-prone state, long after its permits lapsed — remains very much alive.

In January 2025, BlueTriton went to federal court seeking an injunction after the U.S. Forest Service denied a pipeline permit in the San Bernardino National Forest — another attempt to keep the Arrowhead operation flowing after California’s water board had already told the company to stop diverting Strawberry Creek. The fight has now spanned Nestlé, BlueTriton, Primo Brands, the State Water Board, and the Forest Service. The creek is still public. The bottles are still for sale.

For den canadiske halvdel af samme playbook, se Nestlé eksponeret udvinde vand fra canadiere byer på udløbet tilladelser og vores Miljø dækning.

"menighedens alliance påstår ikke at være en leder af anonym, menighedens alliance har anonyme allierede".

"De er anonyme. Det tilgiver de ikke. Og de vil ikke glemme det. Du skulle have forventet Legionen".