(نيستلي) مكشوفة - هو عامل مساهم رئيسي في حرائق (كاليفورنيا) البرية

الرقص على المطر بالارتفاع ضد:

Greetings world! We are The AEGIS Alliance, with, Anonymous allies. As the State of California has been suffering from yet another wave of wildfires this year, corporations come to mind, one of most interest being Nestle, and their unlawful actions in California, and other states, even in other countries. This December, كان هناك حرائق برية في "لوس أنجليس"، "سان دييغو"، "سانتا باربرا"، "سان بيرناردينو"، ومقاطعات التهوية في كاليفورنيا- لا يزال بعضها غير وارد في هذا الوقت. إجمالا في عدة كانون الأول/ديسمبر أحرق أكثر من 000 256 فدان وأجبر 000 21 من السكان لإخلاء منازلهمدمر أكثر من 000 1 هيكل، بما في ذلك العديد من المنازل.

السؤال هو، هل كان (نيسل) يعمل عامل مساهم رئيسي في كاليفورنيا حالات الجفافالسبب في أن (نايسل) كان يغلي الماء في كاليفورنيا تصاريح منتهية المدة لمدة 27 سنة. It is unknown as to just how many unfathomable amounts of water that Nestle drained from California, over those past decades. This is cause for alarm, with so much water being extracted from California, and thereby being a key contributing factor in California’s very dry ground conditions. Nestle also has a bad reputation in Oregon and is the cause of protests in the state of Washington. Nestle also extracts water in other U.S. states.

ومع ذلك، فإن الولايات المتحدة ليست وحدها في نستل تضخ المياه في تصاريح منتهية. تم القبض على (نيسل) أيضاً في كندا, in recent times. Nestle had been bottling so much water in these Canadian towns, that it was being done faster than the aquifers were able to be replenished, until Canadian authorities stepped in, and did something about it. This makes it obvious, that Nestle has used these same greedy practices in California for many years, thereby being a key factor in the very dry ground conditions. It makes billions of dollars in profit by extracting water عملياً لا شيءمقارنة بالإيرادات الهائلة التي أخذتها.

Unlawful bottling of water isn’t the only type of crime to humanity by Nestle. They’re also a chocolate company, that is known to use child labor in cacao plantations. Nestle also has a history of lax labor laws, which allows them to evade close scrutiny of its labor practices. Nestle dodges accountability by having factory locations in places such as Columbia, North Korea, and China while avoiding the many more legal protections in the United States. Nestle has also been the cause of much outrage by Environmental and Human Rights activists, and many others over the years, for their bad practices. There have been protests to منتجات عش المقاطعةولأكثر مما هو مدرج في هذا الفيديو. (نايسل) أفلت من النور بسبب جرائمها الوحشية للإنسانية على مر العقود

إذا كان الأمر عائداً إلينا، (نيسل) سيُتهم بالمساهمة العديد من روايات الحرائق البريةتدمير الممتلكات، تكاليف خدمات الطوارئ، وربما حتى موت تلك الأرواح البريئة التي أخذتها هذه النيران البرية على مر السنين في كاليفورنيا. كل ذلك لأن نستل استخرج كميات غير قابلة للتلف من الماء على تصاريح منتهية لمدة 27 سنة في ولاية كاليفورنيا مع عدم القيام بأي شيء حيال ذلك.

In the years since this report first aired, the story has taken several major turns. In 2021, Nestlé sold its entire U.S. and Canadian bottled-water business — including the Arrowhead brand pumped from California’s San Bernardino National Forest — to the private-equity firms One Rock Capital Partners and Metropoulos & Co. for roughly $4.3 billion. The operation was rebranded as BlueTriton Brands, but the underlying fight over Strawberry Creek did not change hands so cleanly. California regulators made clear the sale would not stall their enforcement.

In September 2023, California’s State Water Resources Control Board approved a cease-and-desist order blocking BlueTriton from diverting millions of gallons of water out of the Strawberry Creek watershed — the same creek tied to the permit that expired back in 1988. Campaigners summed up the case bluntly: one cannot sell what it does not own, and the board found that neither BlueTriton nor its predecessors had ever perfected a valid pre-1914 water right to the creek. Strawberry Creek feeds the Santa Ana River, a source of drinking water for roughly 750,000 residents, and conservationists argued the decades of pumping had helped desiccate a fragile ecosystem already strained by climate change. The company disputed the findings and pursued appeals, while activists pointed to data showing it had drawn far more water than permitted.

The corporate shell game continued in November 2024, when BlueTriton merged with Primo Water to form Primo Brands Corporation, now trading publicly on the New York Stock Exchange. The names on the bottles keep changing, but the core grievance that drove this report — a multinational profiting off public water in a drought-prone, fire-prone state, long after its permits lapsed — remains very much alive.

In January 2025, BlueTriton went to federal court seeking an injunction after the U.S. Forest Service denied a pipeline permit in the San Bernardino National Forest — another attempt to keep the Arrowhead operation flowing after California’s water board had already told the company to stop diverting Strawberry Creek. The fight has now spanned Nestlé, BlueTriton, Primo Brands, the State Water Board, and the Forest Service. The creek is still public. The bottles are still for sale.

للنصف الكندي من نفس الكتاب وكشفت نستيه عن استخراج المياه من المدن الكندية في تصاريح انتهت صلاحيتها ولدينا البيئة التغطية

"التحالف الأيجى لا يزعم أن يكون قائداً مجهولاً، تحالف الأهى لديه حلفاء مجهولين"

"إنهم مجهولون" لا يسامحون هذا ولن ينسون ذلك كان عليك توقع الفيلق