Nestlé は、カリフォルニアの野火事に重要な貢献因子です。

雨が降るのに:

Greetings world! We are The AEGIS Alliance, with, Anonymous allies. As the State of California has been suffering from yet another wave of wildfires this year, corporations come to mind, one of most interest being Nestle, and their unlawful actions in California, and other states, even in other countries. This December, そこには野生の火事があります 天使、サン・ダイゴ、サンタバーバラ、サン・ベルナーディノ、ベンチュラ・カウント カリフォルニア. 一部は現時点では含まれていません。 全体, いくつかの 12 月をブラウズ 256,000エーカー以上焼却し、強制的 212,000人の住民が家を避難、多くの家を含む1000以上の構造が破壊されました。

質問は、Nestleがカリフォルニアのキーコントリビュート要因を再生しました 干ばつげた条件? なぜ年2015年、ネストルはカリフォルニアで瓶詰め水だったのか 有効期限が切れた27年間の許可. It is unknown as to just how many unfathomable amounts of water that Nestle drained from California, over those past decades. This is cause for alarm, with so much water being extracted from California, and thereby being a key contributing factor in California’s very dry ground conditions. Nestle also has a bad reputation in Oregon and is the cause of protests in the state of Washington. Nestle also extracts water in other U.S. states.

しかし、米国は、期限切れの許可でネストの瓶詰め水だけではいません。 ネスレもボトリングウォーターをキャッチしました カナダでの期限切れの許可, in recent times. Nestle had been bottling so much water in these Canadian towns, that it was being done faster than the aquifers were able to be replenished, until Canadian authorities stepped in, and did something about it. This makes it obvious, that Nestle has used these same greedy practices in California for many years, thereby being a key factor in the very dry ground conditions. It makes billions of dollars in profit by extracting water 実用的に何も大量所得と比較した場合。

Unlawful bottling of water isn’t the only type of crime to humanity by Nestle. They’re also a chocolate company, that is known to use child labor in cacao plantations. Nestle also has a history of lax labor laws, which allows them to evade close scrutiny of its labor practices. Nestle dodges accountability by having factory locations in places such as Columbia, North Korea, and China while avoiding the many more legal protections in the United States. Nestle has also been the cause of much outrage by Environmental and Human Rights activists, and many others over the years, for their bad practices. There have been protests to Boycott ネスト製品このビデオに含まれているものよりも、 ネストルは、十数年にわたって人類への道徳的な犯罪のために、非常に光を遮断しました。

弊社までお越しの場合、Nestle は、 野生火災の多くのアカウント, 財産の破壊, 緊急サービスの費用, おそらく、これらの不当な生活の死でさえ、カリフォルニアで長年にわたって. ネストルはカリフォルニア州の州で27年間期限切れの許可で不当な量の水を抽出したため、すべて、 それについて何も行っていない.

In the years since this report first aired, the story has taken several major turns. In 2021, Nestlé sold its entire U.S. and Canadian bottled-water business — including the Arrowhead brand pumped from California’s San Bernardino National Forest — to the private-equity firms One Rock Capital Partners and Metropoulos & Co. for roughly $4.3 billion. The operation was rebranded as BlueTriton Brands, but the underlying fight over Strawberry Creek did not change hands so cleanly. California regulators made clear the sale would not stall their enforcement.

In September 2023, California’s State Water Resources Control Board approved a cease-and-desist order blocking BlueTriton from diverting millions of gallons of water out of the Strawberry Creek watershed — the same creek tied to the permit that expired back in 1988. Campaigners summed up the case bluntly: one cannot sell what it does not own, and the board found that neither BlueTriton nor its predecessors had ever perfected a valid pre-1914 water right to the creek. Strawberry Creek feeds the Santa Ana River, a source of drinking water for roughly 750,000 residents, and conservationists argued the decades of pumping had helped desiccate a fragile ecosystem already strained by climate change. The company disputed the findings and pursued appeals, while activists pointed to data showing it had drawn far more water than permitted.

The corporate shell game continued in November 2024, when BlueTriton merged with Primo Water to form Primo Brands Corporation, now trading publicly on the New York Stock Exchange. The names on the bottles keep changing, but the core grievance that drove this report — a multinational profiting off public water in a drought-prone, fire-prone state, long after its permits lapsed — remains very much alive.

In January 2025, BlueTriton went to federal court seeking an injunction after the U.S. Forest Service denied a pipeline permit in the San Bernardino National Forest — another attempt to keep the Arrowhead operation flowing after California’s water board had already told the company to stop diverting Strawberry Creek. The fight has now spanned Nestlé, BlueTriton, Primo Brands, the State Water Board, and the Forest Service. The creek is still public. The bottles are still for sale.

同じ Playbook のカナダの半分については、 期限切れの許可でカナダの町から水を抽出するネステレ そして私達の 環境方針 カバー。

「 aegis アライアンスは匿名のリーダーであると主張しません。 aegis アライアンスは匿名の同盟国を持っています。」

「彼らは匿名です。 これを許さない。 それを忘れずに。 レギオンが期待されているはずです。