{"id":54095,"date":"2020-08-27T14:21:40","date_gmt":"2020-08-27T21:21:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.theaegisalliance.com\/?p=54095"},"modified":"2026-10-06T07:36:40","modified_gmt":"2026-10-06T14:36:40","slug":"lee-county-sheriff-carmine-marceno-cover-up-of-state-attorney-amira-fox-forgery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/2020\/08\/27\/lee-county-sheriff-carmine-marceno-cover-up-of-state-attorney-amira-fox-forgery\/","title":{"rendered":"Sheriff Carmine Marceno&rsquo;s Ethics Case Sits in Limbo While Amira Fox&rsquo;s Alleged Court-Order Forgery Against Scott Huminski Stays Uncharged"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA \u2014<\/strong> Amira Fox will sit as state attorney for a third term without having to debate anyone. Carmine Marceno is still sheriff while a state ethics file about gifts and a consulting contract sits unresolved in Tallahassee. Neither of those facts erases the stack of court paper from June 2017 that activist Scott Huminski says was manufactured so a contempt case could change courthouses. No prosecutor has charged Fox, Clerk of Court Linda Doggett, or Marceno with forgery. They are presumed innocent of any crime that has not been filed. The papers, the docket, and the silence around them are still public.<\/p>\n<p>Fox locked in that third term the easy way. She filed for reelection on January 5, 2026, and nobody else qualified by the April 20 deadline. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.news-press.com\/story\/news\/politics\/elections\/2026\/05\/29\/amira-fox-state-attorney-in-sw-fl-reelected-will-serve-third-term\/90258184007\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Fort Myers News-Press<\/a> reported on May 29, 2026 that she would serve again unopposed, the same way she did in 2022. She was first elected in 2018, the first woman to hold the job in the 20th Judicial Circuit, which covers Lee, Collier, Charlotte, Hendry, and Glades counties. She started in that office as an assistant state attorney in 1990.<\/p>\n<p>Marceno\u2019s path was different, and the old description of him as an unelected sheriff is out of date. Then-Governor Rick Scott appointed him in 2018 after Mike Scott stepped aside. Voters have kept him since. What has not gone away is the question of what his office did, and did not do, when Huminski put a forgery complaint in front of it.<\/p>\n<h2>A gag order, then a contempt case<\/h2>\n<p>Huminski, who fronts the band <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/scottxmysteryband\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Scott X and the Constitution Commandos<\/a>, says he was getting death threats traced to Maricopa County, Arizona, from 2013 through 2017. He reported them to then-Sheriff Mike Scott. Instead of a threat investigation he could live with, he got a protective order that turned further contact with the sheriff or the sheriff\u2019s staff into contempt. <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/mike-scott-motion-for-protective-order.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">The motion<\/a> is still online. Reporting a crime, Huminski has argued ever since, was itself treated as the crime.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_54097\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-54097\" style=\"width: 798px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-54097\" src=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/mike-scott-gag-order-screenshot.jpg\" alt=\"Court document from the Scott Huminski case in Lee County, Florida, detailing Defendant Mike Scott&apos;s motion to prohibit the plaintiff from directly contacting Sheriff Mike Scott and his agents. Case No. 17-CA-000421.\" width=\"798\" height=\"536\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-54097\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Lee County Sheriff Mike Scott\u2019s gag-order motion against Scott Huminski<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The contempt fight was opened in circuit court as case 17-CA-421. Fox\u2019s office wanted it in front of Circuit Judge Elizabeth Krier. Krier recused herself over a conflict. Chief Circuit Judge Michael McHugh was next. Huminski\u2019s account, laid out in filings that later reached the Florida Supreme Court, is that Fox did not want McHugh. She wanted a different building, a different judge, and a misdemeanor docket.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Anonymous Exposes Sheriff Mike Scott Under Federal Control!\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/7h7dkKVkBM4?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<h2>Two dates on one piece of paper<\/h2>\n<p>On June 30, 2017, according to the documents Huminski has circulated for years, a June 5 circuit order was printed, marked by hand with a new Lee County court number, 17-MM-815, and filed as if it were a fresh judicial order. The signature on it is Judge Krier\u2019s from the earlier case. There is no new signature. The header carries the June 5 file stamp and a June 30 stamp. Court orders are not supposed to be recycled.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_54128\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-54128\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-54128\" src=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/page-1-of-6-5-order-prior-to-service-scott-huminski.jpg\" alt=\"Page 1 of the June 5, 2017 order in the Scott Huminski case before service, Lee County Circuit Court civil case 17-CA-421.\" width=\"800\" height=\"1037\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-54128\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Page 1 of the June 5, 2017 order, before service<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_54129\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-54129\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-54129\" src=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/page-1-of-6-5-order-served-scott-huminski.jpg\" alt=\"Page 1 of the June 5, 2017 order as served in the Scott Huminski contempt matter.\" width=\"800\" height=\"1037\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-54129\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Page 1 of the June 5 order, marked served<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_54130\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-54130\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-54130\" src=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/page-1-of-forgery-scott-huminski.jpg\" alt=\"Page 1 of the June 30, 2017 filing Huminski calls a forgery, showing case 17-MM-815 written onto a June 5 circuit order.\" width=\"800\" height=\"1037\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-54130\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Page 1 of the June 30 filing, with a handwritten county-court number<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_54413\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-54413\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-54413\" src=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Forgery-1-double-time-stamps-different-dates.jpg\" alt=\"Clerk time stamps on the disputed order showing both June 5, 2017 and June 30, 2017.\" width=\"800\" height=\"62\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-54413\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Two clerk stamps, June 5 and June 30, on the same filing<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Page 3 of the disputed filing and page 3 of the June 5 order are the comparison Huminski wants a handwriting examiner, or a sheriff, to make. He says the electronic signature matches closely enough that it was lifted, not signed again, and that a real order in the case ran far longer than the three pages that landed on the county docket. The authentic show-cause order he points to is dated on or before April 26, 2017, not June 5, which is the offense date he says the clerk\u2019s sheets later used. <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/krier-show-cause-order-4-26-1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">That April order<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/full-county-docket.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">county docket<\/a> are posted with the story.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_54133\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-54133\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-54133\" src=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/page-3-of-forgery-scott-huminski.jpg\" alt=\"Page 3 of the filing Scott Huminski alleges was forged by lifting Judge Elizabeth Krier&apos;s signature.\" width=\"800\" height=\"1037\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-54133\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Page 3 of the disputed June 30 filing<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_54132\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-54132\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-54132\" src=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/page-3-of-6-5-order-served-scott-huminski.jpg\" alt=\"Page 3 of the June 5, 2017 order as served, which Huminski says is the authentic signature page.\" width=\"800\" height=\"1037\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-54132\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Page 3 of the June 5 order as served<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Florida\u2019s forgery statute, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flsenate.gov\/Laws\/Statutes\/2025\/831.01\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">section 831.01<\/a>, and the official-misconduct statute, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flsenate.gov\/Laws\/Statutes\/2025\/838.022\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">section 838.022<\/a>, both describe third-degree felonies. Huminski also argues the county case never obtained personal jurisdiction because the disputed order was not served. The <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/criminal-case-docket-6-30-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">June 30, 2017 docket sheet<\/a> is his exhibit for that point. A case without service, he says, is not a case. Trying him anyway, in a second court, is how he describes the double-jeopardy and due-process problems, along with the loss of counsel and a jury under <a href=\"https:\/\/casetext.com\/rule\/florida-court-rules\/florida-rules-of-criminal-procedure\/criminal-contempt\/rule-3840-indirect-criminal-contempt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The judge who drew 17-MM-815 was James Adams. Adams had already been reprimanded by the Florida Supreme Court over a sexual relationship with a lawyer appearing before him, <a href=\"https:\/\/casetext.com\/case\/in-re-adams-61\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">In re Adams<\/a>, and the Second District Court of Appeal had criticized his handling of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4552265\/yorlan-espinosa-pena-v-state-of-florida\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Pena v. State<\/a>. Huminski\u2019s theory is that Adams was chosen because he would not stop the transfer. That is an accusation about motive. The public record of the reprimand is not.<\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-x\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">The ethics case against Lee County Sheriff Carmine Marceno remains in limbo. The Florida Commission on Ethics was expected to consider whether there was probable cause of violations last Friday, but no decision was announced. <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/hashtag\/DefendDemocracy?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#DefendDemocracy<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/Sfnq3JIr74\">https:\/\/t.co\/Sfnq3JIr74<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Florida Center for Government Accountability (@FLCTRGA) <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/FLCTRGA\/status\/2095547604012597448?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">September 3, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.x.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/div>\n<\/p>\n<h2>What the sheriff was told<\/h2>\n<p>Huminski did not keep the complaint in a drawer. He sent the comparison, the dockets, and a description of the statutes to the Lee County Sheriff\u2019s Office through a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.muckrock.com\/foi\/lee-county-36\/lee-sheriff-carmine-marceno-cover-up-of-forgery-and-official-misconduct-fs-83101-fs-83802-98820\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">MuckRock Sunshine Law request<\/a> aimed at Marceno. An archived page of his own write-up is <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20200724110026\/https:\/\/leesheriffcarminemarcenocoverupforgerycorruption.wordpress.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">still on the Wayback Machine<\/a>. The sheriff\u2019s office did not open a forgery prosecution. Marceno inherited Mike Scott\u2019s gag order and, Huminski says, kept treating contact with the office as contempt. The AEGIS Alliance has covered the broader record on <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/2020\/06\/12\/lee-county-florida-lcso-sheriff-carmine-marceno-felony-corruption-exposed\/\">Marceno<\/a> and on <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/2017\/01\/07\/lee-county-florida-sheriffs-exposed-for-fabricating-evidence\/\">earlier Lee County allegations<\/a> for years. This file is the one that starts with a date stamp.<\/p>\n<p>The fight left the Lee County courthouse. A jurisdictional brief in <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020-598_brief_137540_juris20initial20brief.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Huminski v. Florida, SC20-598<\/a>, put the account in front of the Florida Supreme Court. A Second District ruling in the related appeal is posted <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/191247_OG64_05082019_09144758_i.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">here<\/a>. On January 1, 2025, Huminski asked Fox\u2019s office, again under the Sunshine Law, for the criminal information or any other charging document that actually opened State v. Huminski, 17-MM-815. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.muckrock.com\/foi\/florida-34\/amira-fox-20th-circuit-states-attorney-criminal-information-state-v-huminski-17-mm-815-florida-state-attorney-20th-circuit-178819\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">MuckRock shows the request rejected<\/a>. He wrote back that a petition was pending in the Sixth District Court of Appeal. The courthouse argument did not retire when the news cycle did.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Lee County Sheriff Carmine Marceno Cover-Up of State Attorney Amira Fox\u2019s Forgery!\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/NBVjFT4XEnE?feature=oembed&#038;enablejsapi=1&#038;origin=https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<h2>A different investigation, the same sheriff<\/h2>\n<p>The forgery complaint and the ethics case are not the same case. They land on the same man. In 2022, former consultant Ken Romano alleges, Marceno steered him a public contract worth $5,700 a month and told him to send $1,700 of it each month to the sheriff\u2019s father, Carmine Marceno Sr., for a Mercedes. Romano also says he gave the sheriff a $9,035 grand piano in 2020 and paid $2,377.03 for furniture at El Dorado Furniture in Fort Myers on January 20, 2022, and that those gifts were left off financial disclosures. The piano falls outside the limitations window the commission is using. The furniture, Romano says, does not. Marceno Sr. died in late 2024. On one recording the Florida Trident has described, the sheriff tells Romano, \u201cWhatever you use your money on, you and my father\u2019s relationship has nothing to do with me.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Federal prosecutors notified Marceno\u2019s lawyer, Donald Day, on November 17, 2025 that the FBI public-corruption investigation was closed and that the office would pursue no further action. The <a href=\"https:\/\/floridatrident.org\/sheriff-marceno-now-facing-state-ethics-investigation-tied-to-dropped-fbi-probe\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Florida Trident<\/a> reported that the federal file had reached a grand jury and then stopped after the lead prosecutor, Assistant U.S. Attorney Mike Gordon, was removed in the post-election purge of January 6 prosecutors. The underlying allegations did not stop with the letter. Romano filed them with the Florida Commission on Ethics. On June 5, 2026, a state ethics investigator was given 60 days past the usual 150-day limit, with the inquiry focused on whether the father received the car payments. A separate complaint against Undersheriff John Holloway was dismissed in June 2026 as hearsay.<\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-x\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Ken Romano is backing out of his ethics complaint against Lee County Sheriff Carmine Marceno. But the Florida Ethics Commission may still be able to continue investigating the allegations of undisclosed gifts and unlawful kickbacks. <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/hashtag\/DefendDemocracy?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#DefendDemocracy<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/hmTSCxpujk\">https:\/\/t.co\/hmTSCxpujk<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Florida Center for Government Accountability (@FLCTRGA) <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/FLCTRGA\/status\/2094854661261914446?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">September 1, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.x.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p>Then the witness blinked. The Trident reported on September 1, 2026 that Romano had asked to withdraw the complaint, sending the letter about 55 days after the June 5 extension, ahead of a closed-door probable-cause hearing at the end of August. A second ethics matter, brought by former commander James Bogliole, concerns a 2023 stop of an off-duty deputy accused of driving over 100 mph. Bogliole says supervisors pressed him to alter reports. As of September 3, 2026, the Florida Center for Government Accountability said no probable-cause decision had been announced. Marceno has not been charged in the ethics matters either. A closed federal case is not an acquittal on the papers, and a withdrawn complaint is not a finding that the Mercedes payments never happened.<\/p>\n<p>Fox, meanwhile, has the job until the term voters did not even get to contest runs out. Marceno still controls the agency Huminski asked to investigate her filing. The June 5 order, the June 30 stamp, and the handwritten number 17-MM-815 have not been explained in a courtroom that was willing to call them what Huminski calls them. Until someone with a badge treats those two dates as evidence rather than noise, the cover-up claim is not a metaphor. It is a description of what has not been done.<\/p>\n<p>Related from The AEGIS Alliance: <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/2020\/09\/29\/trump-bush-hannity-rick-scott-best-sheriff-friend-under-doj-and-state-investigation\/\">the federal and ethics scrutiny of Marceno<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/2022\/08\/16\/florida-governor-ron-desantis-watergate-forgery-cover-up-new-nixon\/\">the DeSantis-era silence around the same forgery file<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/2025\/07\/13\/north-fort-myers-florida-man-alleges-violent-false-arrest-and-imprisonment-the-case-of-enzo-vincenzi\/\">Enzo Vincenzi\u2019s false-arrest lawsuit<\/a>, and the <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/category\/news\/police-accountability-news\/\">police accountability<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/category\/news\/us-news\/\">U.S. news<\/a> archives.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Amira Fox won a third term unopposed while Scott Huminski&rsquo;s 2017 forgery file stays uncharged. Sheriff Carmine Marceno&rsquo;s separate ethics case over gifts and a consulting contract remains unresolved.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":54135,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[204521,6,5,21,16,204504],"tags":[205028,204244,15947,205030,188262,205029,204222,191962],"class_list":["post-54095","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-aegis-videos","category-anonymous-and-the-aegis-alliance-news","category-anonymous-news","category-news","category-the-aegis-alliance-news","category-videos","tag-amira-fox","tag-carmine-marceno","tag-corruption","tag-coverup","tag-florida","tag-forgery","tag-lcso","tag-lee-county"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/amira-fox-carmine-marceno-forgery-cover-up.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54095"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54095\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1204660,"href":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54095\/revisions\/1204660"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54095"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theaegisalliance.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}